Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

StackOverflow Point

StackOverflow Point Navigation

  • Web Stories
  • Badges
  • Tags
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Web Stories
  • Badges
  • Tags
Home/ Questions/Q 185461
Alex Hales
  • 0
Alex HalesTeacher
Asked: June 9, 20222022-06-09T23:04:48+00:00 2022-06-09T23:04:48+00:00

command – Best approach for communicating between Emailing microservice and others

  • 0

[ad_1]

I’m wondering what would be the best pattern for communicating with the Emailing microservice.

Let’s assume that the first microservice (initiator) is responsible for managing users and therefore, among others, performs the following tasks:

  • Registering user
  • Updating user’s email
  • Resetting user’s password

All of above require an email confirmation/password reset email to be sent to the provided email address, including some callback URL that would allow to confirm email/set a new password.

I see the following possibilities when it comes to notifying the Emailing service:

  1. Publish/Subscribe pattern – initiator publishes events like UserRegisteredEvent to some messaging bus (eg. RabbitMQ) with an email and callback URL, Emailing service consumes that event and sends email. It seems like the least coupling way and most flexible as any other service could subscribe to these events if needed. But we lose a possibility to inform user when sending emails fails (kind of fire-and-forget).
  2. Request/Response pattern – initiator sends request like SendEmailConfirmationRequest to some bus (eg. RabbitMQ) or remotely runs an action on the Emailing service (eg. gRPC) and basically waits for a response that could be a simple bool in this case. It gives more control and immediate information to the user if something fails.
  3. Command pattern – basically same as the first, but commands would be called like SendEmailConfirmation and sent directly to the Emailing service.

Which one would you choose? How critical do you find getting a response out of the Emailing service in this particular case?

[ad_2]

  • 0 0 Answers
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report
Leave an answer

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

Browse

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Related Questions

  • xcode - Can you build dynamic libraries for iOS and ...

    • 0 Answers
  • bash - How to check if a process id (PID) ...

    • 401 Answers
  • database - Oracle: Changing VARCHAR2 column to CLOB

    • 371 Answers
  • What's the difference between HEAD, working tree and index, in ...

    • 367 Answers
  • Amazon EC2 Free tier - how many instances can I ...

    • 0 Answers

Stats

  • Questions : 43k

Subscribe

Login

Forgot Password?

Footer

Follow

© 2022 Stackoverflow Point. All Rights Reserved.

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.