As you may have noticed, Rust does not have exceptions. It has panics, but their use for error-handling is discouraged (they are meant for unrecoverable errors).

In Rust, error handling uses Result. A typical example would be:

fn halves_if_even(i: i32) -> Result<i32, Error> {
    if i % 2 == 0 {
        Ok(i / 2)
    } else {
        Err(/* something */)
    }
}

fn do_the_thing(i: i32) -> Result<i32, Error> {
    let i = match halves_if_even(i) {
        Ok(i) => i,
        Err(e) => return Err(e),
    };

    // use `i`
}

This is great because:

• when writing the code you cannot accidentally forget to deal with the error,
• when reading the code you can immediately see that there is a potential for error right here.

It’s less than ideal, however, in that it is very verbose. This is where the question mark operator ? comes in.

The above can be rewritten as:

fn do_the_thing(i: i32) -> Result<i32, Error> {
    let i = halves_if_even(i)?;

    // use `i`
}

which is much more concise.

What ? does here is equivalent to the match statement above with an addition. In short:

1. It unpacks the Result if OK
2. It returns the error if not, calling From::from on the error value to potentially convert it to another type.

It’s a bit magic, but error handling needs some magic to cut down the boilerplate, and unlike exceptions it is immediately visible which function calls may or may not error out: those that are adorned with ?.

One example of the magic is that this also works for Option:

// Assume
// fn halves_if_even(i: i32) -> Option<i32>

fn do_the_thing(i: i32) -> Option<i32> {
    let i = halves_if_even(i)?;

    // use `i`
}

The ? operator, stabilized in Rust version 1.13.0 is powered by the (unstable) Try trait.

See also: